168 CloudFlare Nodes in 85 of totally 130 Countries
Visit this page regularly as it is updated daily. Last data update: 31-08-2026 02:20:46 UTC
Africa
Algeria (1|4)
Ethiopia (1|5)
Ivory Coast (1|5)
Kenya (2|7)
Mauritius (1|5)
Mozambique (1|2)
Reunion (1|3)
Rwanda (1|1)
South Africa (2|42)
Tanzania (1|6)
Zimbabwe (1|1)Asia
Armenia (1|5)
Azerbaijan (2|5)
Bahrain (1|1)
Bangladesh (1|34)
China (1|472)
Georgia (1|9)
India (4|111)
Indonesia (3|9)
Israel (2|20)
Japan (3|99)
Jordan (1|4)
Kuwait (1|3)
Laos (1|2)
Malaysia (1|36)
Mongolia (1|1)
Nepal (1|15)
Oman (1|9)
Pakistan (2|16)
Philippines (2|6)
Singapore (1|576)
South Korea (1|10)
Sri Lanka (1|1)
Taiwan (2|23)
Thailand (1|21)
Turkey (1|84)
United Arab Emirates (1|4)
Vietnam (2|4)Europe
Albania (1|4)
Austria (1|147)
Belgium (1|27)
Bulgaria (1|77)
Croatia (1|2)
Cyprus (1|10)
Czech Republic (1|46)
Denmark (1|76)
Estonia (1|18)
Finland (1|22)
France (3|558)
Germany (6|645)
Greece (1|38)
Hungary (1|9)
Iceland (1|2)
Ireland (1|18)
Italy (2|169)
Latvia (1|27)
Lithuania (1|7)
Luxembourg (1|2)
Moldova (1|1)
Netherlands (1|533)
Norway (1|29)
Poland (2|191)
Portugal (1|39)
Romania (1|82)
Russia (1|12)
Serbia (1|14)
Slovakia (1|12)
Spain (2|166)
Sweden (1|80)
Switzerland (2|49)
Ukraine (1|10)
United Kingdom (3|556)
Canada (4|125)
Costa Rica (1|3)
Guatemala (1|4)
Mexico (1|1)
United States (30|1840)
Australia (5|165)
French Polynesia (1|1)
New Caledonia (1|3)
New Zealand (1|10)
Argentina (1|24)
Brazil (5|275)
Chile (1|15)
Ecuador (2|10)Pakistan: 2 Nodes with 16 IP Addresses
| ISB | Islamabad-Rawalpindi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.242.132 |
| ISB | Islamabad-Rawalpindi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.242.134 |
| ISB | Islamabad-Rawalpindi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.242.135 |
| ISB | Islamabad-Rawalpindi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.242.138 |
| ISB | Islamabad-Rawalpindi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.242.139 |
| ISB | Islamabad-Rawalpindi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.242.140 |
| ISB | Islamabad-Rawalpindi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.242.141 |
| KHI | Karachi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.230.139 |
| KHI | Karachi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.244.176 |
| KHI | Karachi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.244.177 |
| KHI | Karachi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.244.182 |
| KHI | Karachi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.244.183 |
| KHI | Karachi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.244.188 |
| KHI | Karachi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.244.189 |
| KHI | Karachi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.244.194 |
| KHI | Karachi | Pakistan (PK) | Pakistan (PK) | 172.69.244.195 |
Parse Time: 7.451 ms
WP-Rush: WordPress Performance by Prevention
Are Page Builders Structurally Heavy by Design?
Page builders provide layout flexibility, but that flexibility often requires additional runtime and markup complexity.
Component Abstraction
Builders abstract layout into modular blocks.Each block introduces wrapper markup and conditional logic.
Asset Bundling
Shared bundles simplify maintenance but increase base payload.Server Generation
Dynamic block rendering can increase backend processing time.When It Matters
High-traffic content sites feel cumulative overhead more strongly.Key Takeaways
- Flexibility often increases baseline cost.
- Measure structural markup weight.
- Evaluate dynamic rendering overhead.
- Use builder features intentionally.