StartยปUnited States

165 CloudFlare Nodes in 85 of totally 130 Countries

Visit this page regularly as it is updated daily. Last data update: 30-05-2026 02:11:16 UTC

Africa

Asia

Europe

North America

Oceania

South America



United States: 29 Nodes with 1727 IP Addresses

CF Code
City
Country
CF IP-Country
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)Canada (CA)162.158.41.189
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.41.19
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.41.204
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.41.243
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.41.34
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)China (CN)162.158.41.40
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.41.41
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.41.51
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)Canada (CA)162.158.41.57
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.42.117
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.42.127
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.42.137
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.42.138
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)Canada (CA)162.158.42.147
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.42.148
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.42.175
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)Philippines (PH)162.158.42.179
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.42.180
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.42.181
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)South Korea (KR)162.158.42.21
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.42.211
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.42.212
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.42.43
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)Canada (CA)162.158.42.44
SEA
Seattle, WAUnited States (US)United States (US)162.158.42.94



Parse Time: 139.421 ms


Is Lazy Loading Always a Net Performance Win?


Lazy loading defers resource loading, but its overall benefit depends on context, rendering behavior, and server characteristics.

The Intended Benefit

Lazy loading reduces initial network payload by deferring offscreen images and assets.
This can improve first paint and reduce bandwidth consumption.

Browser Scheduling Complexity

Modern browsers schedule requests dynamically.
Aggressive deferral may delay resource discovery or introduce layout shifts.
The benefit is not purely additive; timing interactions matter.

Server-Side Considerations

Lazy loading affects client rendering more than backend generation.
If server execution time dominates TTFB, deferring images does not address that root cause.

Edge Cases

Infinite scroll implementations and dynamic galleries sometimes create additional script overhead to manage loading states.
That overhead can offset bandwidth savings.

Measuring Impact

Compare total transferred bytes, LCP, and backend latency independently.
A holistic view prevents over-crediting a single technique.

Conclusion

Lazy loading is powerful when bandwidth and rendering cost dominate.
It is neutral when backend execution is the primary constraint.

Key Takeaways

This website needs at least a screen resolution of 1440 x 900px. Tablets, Smartphones and other mobile devices are not supported!